Mrs Nanda Sandeep Latkar vs Mrs Parubai Balu Kubade — 58/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 18,22,38. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN120004432025

Notice_Unready

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2025

Filing Number

128/2025

Filing Date

27-05-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

27-05-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 18,22,38

Petitioner(s)

Mrs Nanda Sandeep Latkar

Adv. KOTWAL FARUK NAZIRAHMED

Respondent(s)

Mrs Parubai Balu Kubade

Shri Gajanan Rajaram Anpat

Shri Bajrang Rajaram Anpat

Padma Dattatray Chavan

Manager Palus Co Bank Palus

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

01-04-2026

Notice_Unready

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

28-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

01-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendants' application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit on grounds of lack of cause of action. The court held that the plaintiff's plaint adequately alleges a cause of action and claims a share in the suit property, and issues regarding ownership under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act cannot be determined at the application stage and must be proved during trial. Costs awarded in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendants' application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit on grounds of lack of cause of action. The court held that the plaintiff's plaint adequately alleges a cause of action and claims a share in the suit property, and issues regarding ownership under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act cannot be determined at the application stage and must be proved during trial. Costs awarded in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case