Mr Prakash Shivaji alias Shiva Jadhav etc.1 vs Sharad Shamrao Jadhav etc. — 3/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 11th August 2026.

Issues Next hearing 11-Aug-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN120000752024

e-Filing Number

17-01-2024

Filing Number

7/2024

Filing Date

19-Jan-2024

Registration No

3/2024

Registration Date

19-Jan-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

Last updated 12-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mr Prakash Shivaji alias Shiva Jadhav etc.1

    Adv. Shendage Yogesh Jaywant

  2. 2.Sarojini Mahadev Jadhav

    Adv. Shendage Yogesh Jaywant

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sharad Shamrao Jadhav etc.

  2. 2.Ashok Shamrao Jahav

  3. 3.Bhaskar Bhimu Jadhav

Case History

  1. 11-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  6. 17-Sep-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  7. 08-Jul-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  8. 21-Apr-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  9. 03-Mar-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  10. 07-Jan-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  11. 12-Nov-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  12. 10-Sep-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  13. 16-Jul-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  14. 08-May-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  15. 07-May-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  16. 26-Mar-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  17. 12-Feb-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 3/2024 Petitioner(s): Mr. Prakash Shivaji alias Shiva Jadhav and Sarojini Mahadev Jadhav Respondent(s): Sharad Shamrao Jadhav, Ashok Shamrao Jadhav, and Bhaskar Bhimu Jadhav Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (bail/restraining order) against respondents was DISMISSED. The court found that petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case regarding their claimed right to a common passage (survey no. 403) and did not prove balance of convenience in their favor. Key Issue: Dispute over whether survey no. 403 constitutes a common road for access to adjoining properties, with petitioners claiming respondents are unlawfully obstructing this passage through unauthorized construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 12-Feb-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  19. 09-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  20. 05-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  21. 31-Jan-2024

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  22. 30-Jan-2024

    Notice_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  23. 24-Jan-2024

    Notice_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus

  24. 19-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 19-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 19-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3/2024 Petitioner(s): Mr. Prakash Shivaji alias Shiva Jadhav and Sarojini Mahadev Jadhav Respondent(s): Sharad Shamrao Jadhav, Ashok Shamrao Jadhav, and Bhaskar Bhimu Jadhav Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (bail/restraining order) against respondents was DISMISSED. The court found that petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case regarding their claimed right to a common passage (survey no. 403) and did not prove balance of convenience in their favor. Key Issue: Dispute over whether survey no. 403 constitutes a common road for access to adjoining properties, with petitioners claiming respondents are unlawfully obstructing this passage through unauthorized construction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case