State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Abhijit Tukaram Aawate — 34/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN120000652026
Filing Number
50/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Palus
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas
Respondent(s)
Abhijit Tukaram Aawate
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Disposed
Arguments
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-01-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate's Court acquitted Abhijit Tukaram Awte of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged unauthorized possession and sale of illicit liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panch witness contradicted the prosecution's narrative and the seizure procedure lacked credible corroboration. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations and cash security refunded after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate's Court acquitted Abhijit Tukaram Awte of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged unauthorized possession and sale of illicit liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panch witness contradicted the prosecution's narrative and the seizure procedure lacked credible corroboration. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations and cash security refunded after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts