State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Abhijit Tukaram Aawate — 34/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN120000652026

Case disposed

Filing Number

50/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

16-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Excise Department

Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas

Respondent(s)

Abhijit Tukaram Aawate

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

27-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Arguments

16-02-2026

Hearing

16-01-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate's Court acquitted Abhijit Tukaram Awte of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged unauthorized possession and sale of illicit liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panch witness contradicted the prosecution's narrative and the seizure procedure lacked credible corroboration. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations and cash security refunded after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate's Court acquitted Abhijit Tukaram Awte of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged unauthorized possession and sale of illicit liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panch witness contradicted the prosecution's narrative and the seizure procedure lacked credible corroboration. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be discharged, with seized liquor to be disposed of per regulations and cash security refunded after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case