State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Ajay Shivaji Aadake — 33/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN120000642026
Filing Number
49/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Palus
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas
Respondent(s)
Ajay Shivaji Aadake
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Disposed
Arguments
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-01-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted Ajay Shivaji Adke of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 80 sealed bottles of illegal liquor for sale on October 3, 2025. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, citing procedural irregularities in the seizure process, lack of credible witness testimony from the panchnama (official seizure document), and absence of chemical analysis reports. The court ordered the seized liquor to be handed over to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted Ajay Shivaji Adke of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 80 sealed bottles of illegal liquor for sale on October 3, 2025. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, citing procedural irregularities in the seizure process, lack of credible witness testimony from the panchnama (official seizure document), and absence of chemical analysis reports. The court ordered the seized liquor to be handed over to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts