Jayesh Bhimrao Sawant vs State of Maharashtra — 138/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSN110011952025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-12-2025

Filing Number

859/2025

Filing Date

03-12-2025

Registration No

138/2025

Registration Date

03-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

ATPADI POLICE STATION

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Jayesh Bhimrao Sawant

Adv. Kadam Suyash Dadasaheb

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi

16-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Order on Exh

05-03-2026

Order on Exh

20-02-2026

Order on Exh

17-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed applicant Jayesh Bhimrao Sawant's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to release Rs. 10,648 that was frozen in his bank account following a cyber fraud case. The court directed Bank of Baroda and State Bank of India to refund the seized amounts to the applicant's account, relying on the Supreme Court's principle that seized funds should not be held indefinitely, and imposed an indemnity bond condition of Rs. 11,000 as security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed applicant Jayesh Bhimrao Sawant's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to release Rs. 10,648 that was frozen in his bank account following a cyber fraud case. The court directed Bank of Baroda and State Bank of India to refund the seized amounts to the applicant's account, relying on the Supreme Court's principle that seized funds should not be held indefinitely, and imposed an indemnity bond condition of Rs. 11,000 as security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case