Laxman Anna Pujari vs Machindra Anna Pujari Advocate - ॲड. एस.बी. कोळेकर — 201/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN110009172025
e-Filing Number
26-08-2025
Filing Number
274/2025
Filing Date
29-Aug-2025
Registration No
201/2025
Registration Date
29-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Laxman Anna Pujari
Adv. Kshirsagar Satish Bharat
Respondent(s)
-
1.Machindra Anna Pujari Advocate - ॲड. एस.बी. कोळेकर
-
2.Jagganath Anna Pujari
Adv. ॲड. एस.बी. कोळेकर
Case History
-
28-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
-
05-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 201/2025 Summary The Civil Judge at Atpadi allowed respondents' (Machindra Anna Pujari and Jagganath Anna Pujari) application to set aside a decree order, but imposed a cost of Rs. 200 as a condition. The court found that while the respondents delayed filing their affidavit in response, they should be given an opportunity to present their defense in this partition and possession suit, as natural justice requires. Upon payment of costs, the decree against respondents is set aside and their affidavit will be considered on record. Order dated 05/05/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Compliance
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
-
25-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
-
19-Jan-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
-
06-Dec-2025
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
-
01-Nov-2025
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Atpadi
-
29-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
29-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 201/2025
Case 201/2025 Summary The Civil Judge at Atpadi allowed respondents' (Machindra Anna Pujari and Jagganath Anna Pujari) application to set aside a decree order, but imposed a cost of Rs. 200 as a condition. The court found that while the respondents delayed filing their affidavit in response, they should be given an opportunity to present their defense in this partition and possession suit, as natural justice requires. Upon payment of costs, the decree against respondents is set aside and their affidavit will be considered on record. Order dated 05/05/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts