Pallavi Hanmant ManeRepresented by Guardian -Hanmant Krushna Mane vs Sonali Gagendra Mane — 173/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,325,324,34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN110009152022
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
Filing Number
652/2022
Filing Date
29-08-2022
Registration No
173/2022
Registration Date
02-09-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. ATPADI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pallavi Hanmant ManeRepresented by Guardian -Hanmant Krushna Mane
Adv. G H Mane
Respondent(s)
Sonali Gagendra Mane
Vandana Balu Gaikwad
Ankush Santu Gade
Nitin Rajaram Londhe
Chandrakant Dnyanoba Londhe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. ATPADI
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 30-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 29-08-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 02-07-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: FIR 173/22, Atpadi Police Station, Sangli District Outcome: The court recording of the witness examination under CrPC Section 200 is complete. The complainant (Pallavi/Sonali's in-laws) alleged harassment by the daughter-in-law Sonali, including threats and abduction. The court found insufficient evidence of criminal intimidation or wrongdoing against the accused parties and dismissed the complaint, directing that no further action be taken against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: FIR 173/22, Atpadi Police Station, Sangli District Outcome: The court recording of the witness examination under CrPC Section 200 is complete. The complainant (Pallavi/Sonali's in-laws) alleged harassment by the daughter-in-law Sonali, including threats and abduction. The court found insufficient evidence of criminal intimidation or wrongdoing against the accused parties and dismissed the complaint, directing that no further action be taken against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts