Rajendra Krishna Jare vs Shivajirao Narayan Lade Advocate - Vasekar Ajit Damodar — 1300172/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN110004922016
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Number
1300436/2016
Filing Date
22-07-2016
Registration No
1300172/2016
Registration Date
09-08-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. ATPADI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Krishna Jare
Adv. Kadam Shahaji Rajaram
Respondent(s)
Shivajirao Narayan Lade Advocate - Vasekar Ajit Damodar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. ATPADI
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 21-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 17-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Rajendra Zare vs. Shivaji Lade | Sum. Cri. Case No. 172/2016 Outcome: The application filed by the accused for sending the disputed cheque to a handwriting expert for examination of contents (excluding signature) has been rejected. The court found that the accused admitted the signature on the cheque, triggering legal presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act favoring the complainant. The court also noted no admitted handwriting sample existed on record to justify expert examination and ruled the accused cannot rely on the court to collect evidence on his behalf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Rajendra Zare vs. Shivaji Lade | Sum. Cri. Case No. 172/2016 Outcome: The application filed by the accused for sending the disputed cheque to a handwriting expert for examination of contents (excluding signature) has been rejected. The court found that the accused admitted the signature on the cheque, triggering legal presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act favoring the complainant. The court also noted no admitted handwriting sample existed on record to justify expert examination and ruled the accused cannot rely on the court to collect evidence on his behalf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts