Kishor Mohan Rakshe vs Shivaji Bhagwan Patil Advocate - Dani Vinod Shankar — 1300062/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section PartisionPossessionandDeclaration. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN110001692012
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
1300068/2012
Filing Date
24-01-2012
Registration No
1300062/2012
Registration Date
23-02-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kishor Mohan Rakshe
Adv. Mahamuni Jitendra Maruti
Surekha Mohan Rakshe
Adv. Mahamuni Jitendra Maruti
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Bhagwan Patil Advocate - Dani Vinod Shankar
Tanaji Bhagawan Patil
Jayashree Pandurang Pudale
Mohan Jagannath Rakshe
Varsha Santosh Gaikwad
Punam Sidhanath Salunkhe
Nilam Sudihir Nanaware
Madhavi Laxman Varane
Shevantabai Bhagawan Patil
Radhabai Martand Shinde
Gramsevak Grampanchayat Atpadi
Adv. Jadhav Chetan Vishwanath
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi
Evidence Part Heard
Additional Issues
Written Statement
Written Statement
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 07-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 26-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 16-02-2026 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Case Adjourned with Directions In RCS No.62/2012 (Kishor Mohan Rakshe vs Shivaji Bhagwan Patil), the court adjourned the partition suit and directed the plaintiff to file death certificates of his grandparents (Jagannath Namdev Rakshe and Hirabai Jagannath Rakshe) on the next date. The plaintiff was also directed to argue on the maintainability of the suit and address potential rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Uttam vs. Saubhagsingh (AIR 2016 SC 1169). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Adjourned with Directions In RCS No.62/2012 (Kishor Mohan Rakshe vs Shivaji Bhagwan Patil), the court adjourned the partition suit and directed the plaintiff to file death certificates of his grandparents (Jagannath Namdev Rakshe and Hirabai Jagannath Rakshe) on the next date. The plaintiff was also directed to argue on the maintainability of the suit and address potential rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, citing the Supreme Court precedent in Uttam vs. Saubhagsingh (AIR 2016 SC 1169). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts