JIJABAI DATTATRAY GHODAKE vs State of Maharashtra — 12/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHSN110001572026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

114/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

0002

Police Station

ATPADI POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

JIJABAI DATTATRAY GHODAKE

Adv. Vasant Olekar

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi

27-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Order on Exh

07-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

06-03-2026

First Order

26-02-2026

First Order

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, ordering the return of seized livestock and recovered cash (₹26,000) to the rightful owner after livestock theft on 31/12/2025. The court imposed conditions including a ₹30,000 bond and required the petitioner to deposit the recovered amount in court, finding the petitioner as the legitimate owner entitled to custody of the confiscated property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, ordering the return of seized livestock and recovered cash (₹26,000) to the rightful owner after livestock theft on 31/12/2025. The court imposed conditions including a ₹30,000 bond and required the petitioner to deposit the recovered amount in court, finding the petitioner as the legitimate owner entitled to custody of the confiscated property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case