JIJABAI DATTATRAY GHODAKE vs State of Maharashtra — 12/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN110001572026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
114/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0002
Police Station
ATPADI POLICE STATION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JIJABAI DATTATRAY GHODAKE
Adv. Vasant Olekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, ordering the return of seized livestock and recovered cash (₹26,000) to the rightful owner after livestock theft on 31/12/2025. The court imposed conditions including a ₹30,000 bond and required the petitioner to deposit the recovered amount in court, finding the petitioner as the legitimate owner entitled to custody of the confiscated property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi
-
07-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi
-
06-Mar-2026
First Order
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2026
The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, ordering the return of seized livestock and recovered cash (₹26,000) to the rightful owner after livestock theft on 31/12/2025. The court imposed conditions including a ₹30,000 bond and required the petitioner to deposit the recovered amount in court, finding the petitioner as the legitimate owner entitled to custody of the confiscated property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts