Lalita Ravindra Jadhav etc 5 vs Vailshali Ganpatrao Gaikwad etc 3 Advocate - Kulkarni Ravindra Bhalachandra — 1300032/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN110001302015
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
1300042/2015
Filing Date
03-03-2015
Registration No
1300032/2015
Registration Date
03-03-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lalita Ravindra Jadhav etc 5
Adv. Mahamuni Jitendra Maruti
Minakshi Rajendra Deshmukh
Kalpana Sarjerao Deshmukh
Alka Prashant Deshmukh
Panchshila Sanjay Deshmukh
Respondent(s)
Vailshali Ganpatrao Gaikwad etc 3 Advocate - Kulkarni Ravindra Bhalachandra
Sampatrao Alias Ganpatrao Gaikwad
Appasaheb Alias Subhash Ganpatrao Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C., Atpadi
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 15-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 15-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 13-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.2 to set aside a "No Say" order was allowed. The court set aside the No Say order passed on 05/05/2025, finding that while there was an inordinate delay in filing the application, the principles of fair trial and interests of justice warranted allowing the application since valuable rights of the defendant were involved in the suit property concerning declaration and injunction. Cost in cause was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.2 to set aside a "No Say" order was allowed. The court set aside the No Say order passed on 05/05/2025, finding that while there was an inordinate delay in filing the application, the principles of fair trial and interests of justice warranted allowing the application since valuable rights of the defendant were involved in the suit property concerning declaration and injunction. Cost in cause was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts