Bhimrao Bhau Metkari vs Damodar Bhau Metkari Advocate - Madgulkar Tanmay Ravindra — 31/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN110000932025

e-Filing Number

18-01-2025

Filing Number

36/2025

Filing Date

18-Jan-2025

Registration No

31/2025

Registration Date

18-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Atpadi

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

Last updated 13-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhimrao Bhau Metkari

    Adv. Jedge Popat Daji

  2. 2.Prathamesh Bhimrao Metkari

    Adv. Jedge Popat Daji

  3. 3.Neha Bhimrao Metkari

    Adv. Jedge Popat Daji

  4. 4.Ranjana Bhimrao Metkari

    Adv. Jedge Popat Daji

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Damodar Bhau Metkari Advocate - Madgulkar Tanmay Ravindra

  2. 2.Anna Damodar Metkari

  3. 3.Anil Damodar Metkari

    Adv. Madgulkar Tanmay Ravindra

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  6. 31-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  8. 20-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  9. 10-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  10. 09-May-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 31/2025 Outcome: Application for injunction REJECTED. Plaintiff ordered to bear costs. Key Facts: Plaintiffs sought declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction over disputed ancestral land (3H 78R) in Nimbewadi, claiming an oral partition 30 years prior allocated it to them. Defendants (brothers) allegedly began unauthorized construction on the property. Plaintiffs had executed gift deeds in 2023 transferring portions to co-plaintiffs. Court's Reasoning: The judge found critical discrepancies in the plaintiffs' case: (1) gift deeds executed by different brothers described conflicting property boundaries, (2) the plaintiff had filed contradictory documents in related RCS 138/2024, including a compromise deed and partition deed executed after the present suit, (3) no clear documentary evidence established plaintiff's actual possession of the disputed boundaries, and (4) the plaintiff failed to prove defendants were constructing specifically on plaintiff's land rather than their own allocated shares. The court concluded the plaintiff had not established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored defendants, and no irreparable loss would result from rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 09-May-2025

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  12. 06-May-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  13. 11-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  14. 02-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  16. 17-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  17. 17-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  18. 12-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  19. 24-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  20. 06-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 06-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  22. 05-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 05-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.m.f.c., Atpadi

  24. 20-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 20-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 20-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 18-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 31/2025 Outcome: Application for injunction REJECTED. Plaintiff ordered to bear costs. Key Facts: Plaintiffs sought declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction over disputed ancestral land (3H 78R) in Nimbewadi, claiming an oral partition 30 years prior allocated it to them. Defendants (brothers) allegedly began unauthorized construction on the property. Plaintiffs had executed gift deeds in 2023 transferring portions to co-plaintiffs. Court's Reasoning: The judge found critical discrepancies in the plaintiffs' case: (1) gift deeds executed by different brothers described conflicting property boundaries, (2) the plaintiff had filed contradictory documents in related RCS 138/2024, including a compromise deed and partition deed executed after the present suit, (3) no clear documentary evidence established plaintiff's actual possession of the disputed boundaries, and (4) the plaintiff failed to prove defendants were constructing specifically on plaintiff's land rather than their own allocated shares. The court concluded the plaintiff had not established a prima facie case, balance of convenience favored defendants, and no irreparable loss would result from rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case