State of Maharashtra vs Rohit Tanaji Babar etc — 250/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(a),406,323,504,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN100010442021

Evidence

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1047/2021

Filing Date

26-11-2021

Registration No

250/2021

Registration Date

26-11-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Vita

Judge

5-Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division J.M.F.C. Vita

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

Vita Police Station

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 498(a),406,323,504,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Rohit Tanaji Babar etc

Tanaji Tulshiram Babar

Adv. shinde P D

Laxmi Tanaji Babar

Adv. shinde P D

Mukta Tanaji Babar

Adv. shinde P D

Ruturaj Tanaji Babar

Adv. shinde P D

Asha Balaso Babar

Adv. shinde P D

Pooja Sharad Bagal

Adv. Pingale Sambhaji Baburao

Savita Ramchandra Nerve

Adv. Pingale Sambhaji Baburao

Usha Namdev Shinde

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division J.M.F.C. Vita

07-03-2026

Evidence

17-01-2026

Evidence

04-11-2025

Evidence

26-09-2025

Evidence

17-09-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-08-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted permission for applicant Tanaji Tulshiram Babar to renew his passport. Despite pending criminal cases (IPC sections 498(A), 406, 323, 504, 34) and a Domestic Violence Act case, the court found that the applicant's consistent court attendance and the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 of the Constitution outweighed the State's absconding concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted permission for applicant Tanaji Tulshiram Babar to renew his passport. Despite pending criminal cases (IPC sections 498(A), 406, 323, 504, 34) and a Domestic Violence Act case, the court found that the applicant's consistent court attendance and the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21 of the Constitution outweighed the State's absconding concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Vita All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case