Manini Jadhav vs Jitendra Jadhav Advocate - Shinde Santosh Ramdas — 900097/2014
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,21,22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN100004142014
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
900317/2014
Filing Date
30-04-2014
Registration No
900097/2014
Registration Date
30-04-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Vita
Judge
5-Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division J.M.F.C. Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manini Jadhav
Adv. Jadhav Sharad Rajaram
Sartak Jadhav
Adv. Jadhav Sharad Rajaram
Respondent(s)
Jitendra Jadhav Advocate - Shinde Santosh Ramdas
Uttamrao Jadhav
Adv. Salunkhe Sarika Dhondiram
Kamal Jadhav
Adv. Salunkhe Sarika Dhondiram
Asha Jadhav
Smita Jadhav
Adv. Ghorpade Suresh Ganpatrao
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division J.M.F.C. Vita
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-11-2025 | Arguments | |
| 07-10-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application for protection under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner sought protection from respondents (Jitendra and Kamal) and an unknown woman who assaulted her, claiming they physically attacked her in a shared residential building. The court found credible evidence of domestic violence through medical records, police reports, and photographs, and granted a protection order restraining the respondents from committing any form of domestic violence against the petitioner until the final disposal of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application for protection under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner sought protection from respondents (Jitendra and Kamal) and an unknown woman who assaulted her, claiming they physically attacked her in a shared residential building. The court found credible evidence of domestic violence through medical records, police reports, and photographs, and granted a protection order restraining the respondents from committing any form of domestic violence against the petitioner until the final disposal of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts