The State of Maharashtra vs Subhash Honrao Advocate - Patil Dharmendra Babanrao — 900005/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,394,325,323,504,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN100001062015
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
900072/2015
Filing Date
27-01-2015
Registration No
900005/2015
Registration Date
27-01-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Vita
Judge
5-Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division J.M.F.C. Vita
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Vita Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Subhash Honrao Advocate - Patil Dharmendra Babanrao
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Junior Division J.M.F.C. Vita
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by Sanjay Narayana Honarav regarding a stolen motorcycle (Hero Honda CD Deluxe MH-11-AV-1855) valued at ₹18,000 has been dismissed. The court ordered that the police properly seize the motorcycle as evidence and deposit the compensation amount of ₹18,000 with the court within one month, while clarifying that the ownership rights of the actual owner, Mehboob Babusha Sheikh, remain unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by Sanjay Narayana Honarav regarding a stolen motorcycle (Hero Honda CD Deluxe MH-11-AV-1855) valued at ₹18,000 has been dismissed. The court ordered that the police properly seize the motorcycle as evidence and deposit the compensation amount of ₹18,000 with the court within one month, while clarifying that the ownership rights of the actual owner, Mehboob Babusha Sheikh, remain unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts