State of Maharashtra vs Aniket Dhanaji Kamble — 604/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN090014322025

Filing Number

1067/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

604/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

TASGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aniket Dhanaji Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Tasgaon Civil Court acquitted the accused, Aniket Kambale, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence that he possessed 36 bottles of Royal Sant alcoholic beverages for sale. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing gaps in the investigation, including missing documentation regarding seizure procedures and chemical analysis reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 604/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Tasgaon Civil Court acquitted the accused, Aniket Kambale, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence that he possessed 36 bottles of Royal Sant alcoholic beverages for sale. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing gaps in the investigation, including missing documentation regarding seizure procedures and chemical analysis reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case