State of Maharashtra vs Sanjay Sambhaji Ghalge — 541/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN090013082025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

968/2025

Filing Date

17-11-2025

Registration No

541/2025

Registration Date

17-11-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65 E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Sanjay Sambhaji Ghalge

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

01-04-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-02-2026

Hearing

26-12-2025

Hearing

17-11-2025

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary State v. Sanjay Vishangi (Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E)) The Civil Judge Junior Division at Tasgaon acquitted the accused Sanjay Vishangi on April 1, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was illegally possessing 35 bottles of Royal brandy (180ml each) for sale, as the critical chemical examination report of the seized items was not properly submitted as evidence. Due to this evidentiary gap and lack of credible witness testimony, the court found reasonable doubt regarding the commission of the alleged offense and declared the accused not guilty. The court also cancelled his personal bond and ordered disposal of seized contraband after any appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary State v. Sanjay Vishangi (Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E)) The Civil Judge Junior Division at Tasgaon acquitted the accused Sanjay Vishangi on April 1, 2026. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was illegally possessing 35 bottles of Royal brandy (180ml each) for sale, as the critical chemical examination report of the seized items was not properly submitted as evidence. Due to this evidentiary gap and lack of credible witness testimony, the court found reasonable doubt regarding the commission of the alleged offense and declared the accused not guilty. The court also cancelled his personal bond and ordered disposal of seized contraband after any appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case