State of Maharashtra vs Gulab Nivrutti Surywanshi Advocate - Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan — 223/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),190,191(2),118(1),115(2),324(4),352. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN090011452025

Filing Number

836/2025

Filing Date

22-Sep-2025

Registration No

223/2025

Registration Date

22-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

TASGAON POLICE STATION

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 189(2),190,191(2),118(1),115(2),324(4),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gulab Nivrutti Surywanshi Advocate - Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

  2. 2.Abhijit Gulab Surywanshi

    Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

  3. 3.Nivrutti Bhimrao Surywanshi

    Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

  4. 4.Indrajit Bhimrao Surywanshi

    Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

  5. 5.Ranjit Dinkar Surywanshi

    Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

  6. 6.Sandhyarani Gulan Surywanshi

    Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

  7. 7.Sunita Gulab Surywanshi

    Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

  8. 8.Padmini Alias Dhondubai Nivrutti Surywanshi

    Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted all eight accused persons under Indian Penal Code 2023 Sections 118(1), 189(2), 191(2), 115(2), 324(4), and 352 with Section 190. The judge found that while the prosecution presented witness testimony about a violent altercation on March 17, 2025, involving weapons and injuries, the evidence fell short of proving the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined the prosecution failed to establish the criminal elements of the charges sufficiently, warranting acquittal and cancellation of bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Charge

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    Charge

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all eight accused persons under Indian Penal Code 2023 Sections 118(1), 189(2), 191(2), 115(2), 324(4), and 352 with Section 190. The judge found that while the prosecution presented witness testimony about a violent altercation on March 17, 2025, involving weapons and injuries, the evidence fell short of proving the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined the prosecution failed to establish the criminal elements of the charges sufficiently, warranting acquittal and cancellation of bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case