State of Maharashtra vs Ashok Vilas Suryawanshi — 222/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN090011442025
e-Filing Number
17-07-2025
Filing Number
835/2025
Filing Date
22-09-2025
Registration No
222/2025
Registration Date
22-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
140
Police Station
TASGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Ashok Vilas Suryawanshi
Savita Ashok Suryawanshi
Adv. null
Rahul Ashok Suryawanshi
Adv. null
Rohan Ashok Suryawanshi
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Tasargaon Court acquitted four defendants (Ashok Vilas Suryavamshi, Savita Ashok Suryavamshi, Rahul Ashok Suryavamshi, and Rohan Ashok Suryavamshi) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting four complainants on March 17, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt, as witnesses did not support the prosecution and appeared to have settled the matter out of court, creating reasonable doubts about whether the alleged incident actually occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Tasargaon Court acquitted four defendants (Ashok Vilas Suryavamshi, Savita Ashok Suryavamshi, Rahul Ashok Suryavamshi, and Rohan Ashok Suryavamshi) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, and 3(5) for allegedly assaulting four complainants on March 17, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt, as witnesses did not support the prosecution and appeared to have settled the matter out of court, creating reasonable doubts about whether the alleged incident actually occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts