Vilas Kolekar vs Krishnabai Jankar Advocate - Kanse Sandip Shankar — 167/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Process Fee. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090010512018
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
274/2018
Filing Date
08-10-2018
Registration No
167/2018
Registration Date
10-10-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vilas Kolekar
Adv. Mane Vaibhavkumar Pandurang
Bhaskar Kolekar
Prabhakar Kolekar
Kisan Kolekar
Adv. Kanse Sandip Shankar
Hanmant Kolekar
Mohan Kolekar
Respondent(s)
Krishnabai Jankar Advocate - Kanse Sandip Shankar
Koyanabai Tamkhade
Madhukar Shendge
Sadashiv Shendge
Sampadi Kolekar
Sangeeta Shendge
Hemant Shendge
Mahesh Shendge
Tulsabai Shendge(Legal Heir)(Dead)
10. Kum. Uttam Popat Koli Legal Guardian Shri. Popat Dattatray Koli
11. Sou. Vaishali Popat Koli
12. Popat Dattatray Koli
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Process Fee
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Notice_Unready
Amended Plaint
Process Fee
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Process Fee | |
| 30-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 16-12-2025 | Notice_Unready | |
| 20-11-2025 | Amended Plaint | |
| 03-10-2025 | Process Fee |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the suit by adding a declaration of title as an additional relief and impleading the third-party purchaser as a defendant. The court found that since the defendants denied the plaintiff's title and the suit involves title-based injunction, the relief of declaration is necessary, and the third-party purchaser (subsequent owner) is an essential party without whom an effective decree cannot be passed. The plaintiff was directed to file the amended pleading within 8 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the suit by adding a declaration of title as an additional relief and impleading the third-party purchaser as a defendant. The court found that since the defendants denied the plaintiff's title and the suit involves title-based injunction, the relief of declaration is necessary, and the third-party purchaser (subsequent owner) is an essential party without whom an effective decree cannot be passed. The plaintiff was directed to file the amended pleading within 8 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts