Pushpa Subhash Gaikwad vs Hemant Jagannath Shinde Advocate - Jadhav Babaso Bhimrao — 175/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090009692025
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
06-08-2025
Filing Number
289/2025
Filing Date
07-08-2025
Registration No
175/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpa Subhash Gaikwad
Adv. Rutuja Laxman Kadam
Respondent(s)
Hemant Jagannath Shinde Advocate - Jadhav Babaso Bhimrao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
List of Witness
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 13-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 15-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 25-09-2025 | List of Witness | |
| 20-09-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by Pushpa against Hemal under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order 39, Rules 1-2) has been ALLOWED. The court granted immediate interim relief (temporary injunction) restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's ownership and possession of the disputed property in Tasgaon, and prohibiting any unauthorized construction on the land. The court found that the plaintiff has demonstrated a stronger legal case and would suffer irreparable harm without such protection, and therefore the petition merits approval pending final judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by Pushpa against Hemal under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order 39, Rules 1-2) has been ALLOWED. The court granted immediate interim relief (temporary injunction) restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's ownership and possession of the disputed property in Tasgaon, and prohibiting any unauthorized construction on the land. The court found that the plaintiff has demonstrated a stronger legal case and would suffer irreparable harm without such protection, and therefore the petition merits approval pending final judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts