Pushpa Subhash Gaikwad vs Hemant Jagannath Shinde Advocate - Jadhav Babaso Bhimrao — 175/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN090009692025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

06-08-2025

Filing Number

289/2025

Filing Date

07-08-2025

Registration No

175/2025

Registration Date

07-08-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Pushpa Subhash Gaikwad

Adv. Rutuja Laxman Kadam

Respondent(s)

Hemant Jagannath Shinde Advocate - Jadhav Babaso Bhimrao

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-11-2025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

25-09-2025

List of Witness

20-09-2025

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

25-09-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary The petition filed by Pushpa against Hemal under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order 39, Rules 1-2) has been ALLOWED. The court granted immediate interim relief (temporary injunction) restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's ownership and possession of the disputed property in Tasgaon, and prohibiting any unauthorized construction on the land. The court found that the plaintiff has demonstrated a stronger legal case and would suffer irreparable harm without such protection, and therefore the petition merits approval pending final judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed by Pushpa against Hemal under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order 39, Rules 1-2) has been ALLOWED. The court granted immediate interim relief (temporary injunction) restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's ownership and possession of the disputed property in Tasgaon, and prohibiting any unauthorized construction on the land. The court found that the plaintiff has demonstrated a stronger legal case and would suffer irreparable harm without such protection, and therefore the petition merits approval pending final judgment on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case