Raghunath Gaikwad vs Dadaso Gakikwad Advocate - Khare Shruti Shripad — 800161/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O-7,R-13. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090007732013
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
800329/2013
Filing Date
24-10-2013
Registration No
800161/2013
Registration Date
25-10-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raghunath Gaikwad
Adv. Mohite Anil Appaso
Tukaram Gaikwad
Respondent(s)
Dadaso Gakikwad Advocate - Khare Shruti Shripad
Yashoda Mane
Rajaram Gaikwad
Mohan Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 16-01-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-12-2025 | Steps | |
| 15-10-2025 | Steps | |
| 20-08-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendants' application to frame a preliminary issue under Section 9A of CPC regarding res-judicata was rejected. The court found that while both suits involved the same parties and sought perpetual injunction, the suit properties were different (Gat Nos. 434A & 434B in the prior suit vs. Gat Nos. 374 & 376 in the present suit), thus the principle of res-judicata did not apply. Additionally, Section 9A was deleted effective 27.06.2018, and the application was filed after this amendment, making it untenable. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendants' application to frame a preliminary issue under Section 9A of CPC regarding res-judicata was rejected. The court found that while both suits involved the same parties and sought perpetual injunction, the suit properties were different (Gat Nos. 434A & 434B in the prior suit vs. Gat Nos. 374 & 376 in the present suit), thus the principle of res-judicata did not apply. Additionally, Section 9A was deleted effective 27.06.2018, and the application was filed after this amendment, making it untenable. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts