Shri Ratan Ananda Pawar vs Shri Dattatrya Bapu Jadhav Advocate - Mali Vikas Chandrakant — 94/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090005382016
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
183/2016
Filing Date
23-06-2016
Registration No
94/2016
Registration Date
24-06-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Ratan Ananda Pawar
Adv. Dhende Vijay Vishwas
Shri Vijay Ananda Pawar
Adv. Dhende Vijay Vishwas
Respondent(s)
Shri Dattatrya Bapu Jadhav Advocate - Mali Vikas Chandrakant
Shri Vasant Bapu Jadhav(Legal Heir)
Adv. Mali Vikas Chandrakant
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 03-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 02-12-2025 | Dismissal Order | |
| 13-10-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petitioner's plea to condone the delay in impleading the heirs of deceased Respondent No. 2 (Vasant Bapu Jadhav, who died on 07.10.2021) and to set aside the abatement order has been allowed. The court found that the petitioner made reasonable efforts to obtain the death certificate despite facing obstacles, and therefore the delay was not deliberate. The court ordered that the heirs of Respondent No. 2 be impleaded in the case, with the petitioner required to pay a cost of ₹1,000 to Respondent No. 1 within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petitioner's plea to condone the delay in impleading the heirs of deceased Respondent No. 2 (Vasant Bapu Jadhav, who died on 07.10.2021) and to set aside the abatement order has been allowed. The court found that the petitioner made reasonable efforts to obtain the death certificate despite facing obstacles, and therefore the delay was not deliberate. The court ordered that the heirs of Respondent No. 2 be impleaded in the case, with the petitioner required to pay a cost of ₹1,000 to Respondent No. 1 within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts