Balaso Shamu Mandle vs Amol Phadanis Mandle Advocate - Mahadik Bapusaheb Mahadeo — 64/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090004902023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
117/2023
Filing Date
20-04-2023
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
21-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balaso Shamu Mandle
Adv. Zende Milind Vasant
Dilip Subrao Mandle
Adv. Zende Milind Vasant
Bharat Subrao Mandle
Adv. Zende Milind Vasant
Respondent(s)
Amol Phadanis Mandle Advocate - Mahadik Bapusaheb Mahadeo
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 21-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 01-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 20-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
The respondent's petition is allowed. The previous order denying the technical plea under Criminal Procedure Code Section 5 is set aside, and the respondent's arguments must now be recorded on the merits for adjudication by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The respondent's petition is allowed. The previous order denying the technical plea under Criminal Procedure Code Section 5 is set aside, and the respondent's arguments must now be recorded on the merits for adjudication by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts