State of Maharashtra vs Ajay Kelan Advocate - Bhosale Jalindhar Shankar — 63/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,323. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN090004222016
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
296/2016
Filing Date
16-05-2016
Registration No
63/2016
Registration Date
17-05-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
TASGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Patil Vinayak Appasaheb
Respondent(s)
Ajay Kelan Advocate - Bhosale Jalindhar Shankar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 11-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 15-12-2025 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 09-10-2025 | Awaiting Warrant | |
| 31-07-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Criminal Case No. 63/2016 (State of Maharashtra vs. Ajay Shashikant Kelan), the court issued a standing Non-Bailable Warrant (N.B.W.) and proclamation under Section 82 of the CrPC, along with an attachment warrant under Section 83 of the CrPC against the accused. The accused, who was previously released on cash security of Rs. 500, absconded after 05/07/2016 and failed to appear before the court despite multiple adjournments, necessitating coercive measures to secure his appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Criminal Case No. 63/2016 (State of Maharashtra vs. Ajay Shashikant Kelan), the court issued a standing Non-Bailable Warrant (N.B.W.) and proclamation under Section 82 of the CrPC, along with an attachment warrant under Section 83 of the CrPC against the accused. The accused, who was previously released on cash security of Rs. 500, absconded after 05/07/2016 and failed to appear before the court despite multiple adjournments, necessitating coercive measures to secure his appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts