State of Maharashtra vs Sunita Shrikant Suryavanshi etc 3 Advocate - Patil Krishana Vithoba — 79/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,341,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN090004212024
e-Filing Number
12-01-2024
Filing Number
352/2024
Filing Date
20-03-2024
Registration No
79/2024
Registration Date
20-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
260
Police Station
TASGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sunita Shrikant Suryavanshi etc 3 Advocate - Patil Krishana Vithoba
Ashok Vilas Suryavanshi
Savita Ashok Suryavanshi
Rohan Ashok Suryavanshi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate, Tasgaon, acquitted four accused persons (Sunita Srikant Suryavnshi, Ashok Vilas Suryavnshi, Savita Ashok Suryavnshi, and Rohn Ashok Suryavnshi) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 326, 341, 504, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault and intimidation that occurred on June 1, 2023, as witnesses did not support the prosecution case, likely due to an out-of-court settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate, Tasgaon, acquitted four accused persons (Sunita Srikant Suryavnshi, Ashok Vilas Suryavnshi, Savita Ashok Suryavnshi, and Rohn Ashok Suryavnshi) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 326, 341, 504, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations of assault and intimidation that occurred on June 1, 2023, as witnesses did not support the prosecution case, likely due to an out-of-court settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts