Shri. Aanandrao Shinde vs Shri. Gajanan Shinde — 35/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090002952018
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
78/2018
Filing Date
16-03-2018
Registration No
35/2018
Registration Date
17-03-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Aanandrao Shinde
Adv. Walujkar V. S.
Respondent(s)
Shri. Gajanan Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
Restored
Appearance
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 21-01-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 05-01-2026 | Restored | |
| 05-01-2026 | Appearance | |
| 15-07-2023 | Disposed |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Civil Suit No. 35 of 2018, the plaintiff Anandarao Dattajirao Shinde sought recovery of possession of agricultural land (Gat Nos. 30/C, 30/D, 30/F) at Arwade, Sangli district, claiming the defendant made illegal construction and encroached upon his property. The court found that while the plaintiff proved his ownership based on a 1992 partition decree and symbolic possession in 2017, he failed to substantiate the alleged encroachment and illegal construction by the defendant through credible evidence. The suit was dismissed with costs on 15.07.2023, as the plaintiff could not establish his claims for possession, mandatory injunction, or mesne profits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Civil Suit No. 35 of 2018, the plaintiff Anandarao Dattajirao Shinde sought recovery of possession of agricultural land (Gat Nos. 30/C, 30/D, 30/F) at Arwade, Sangli district, claiming the defendant made illegal construction and encroached upon his property. The court found that while the plaintiff proved his ownership based on a 1992 partition decree and symbolic possession in 2017, he failed to substantiate the alleged encroachment and illegal construction by the defendant through credible evidence. The suit was dismissed with costs on 15.07.2023, as the plaintiff could not establish his claims for possession, mandatory injunction, or mesne profits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts