Shri. Ashok Maruti Jadhav vs Shri. Tanaji Namdeo Jadhav Advocate - Medsinge Nandkumar Pandurang — 45/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090002202016
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
76/2016
Filing Date
11-03-2016
Registration No
45/2016
Registration Date
16-03-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Ashok Maruti Jadhav
Adv. Shinde Vikramsinh Balasaheb
Smt. Bhagirathi Maruti Jadhav
Adv. Shinde Vikramsinh Balasaheb
Respondent(s)
Shri. Tanaji Namdeo Jadhav Advocate - Medsinge Nandkumar Pandurang
Shri. Dhananjay Namdeo Jadhav
Smt. Shakuntala Ramrao Mane
Smt. Kamal Ashok Mohite
Smt. Vimal Vishnupant Hirugade
Sou. Kumodini Rajaram Shinde
Smt. Laxmi Vilas Jadhav
Shri. Vinayak Vilas Jadhav
Smt. Aasha Aanandrao Jadhav
Shri. Sandip Anandrao Jadhav
Shri. Dhiraj Anandrao Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 15-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application is allowed. Defendants No.1 and 4 to 10 are permitted to file their written statement, which was initially submitted beyond the prescribed time limit, subject to payment of costs of Rs.400/- to the plaintiffs as a condition precedent. The court found the reasons for the delay to be proper and justified in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application is allowed. Defendants No.1 and 4 to 10 are permitted to file their written statement, which was initially submitted beyond the prescribed time limit, subject to payment of costs of Rs.400/- to the plaintiffs as a condition precedent. The court found the reasons for the delay to be proper and justified in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts