Shri. Shankar Patil vs Shri. Tanaji Pawar Advocate - Patil Sanjay Balkrishna — 11/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 54. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090000922017
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
43/2017
Filing Date
20-01-2017
Registration No
11/2017
Registration Date
21-01-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Shankar Patil
Adv. Shinde Amit Govind
Respondent(s)
Shri. Tanaji Pawar Advocate - Patil Sanjay Balkrishna
Shri. Dilip Pawar
Smt. Sampat Pawar(Legal Heir)
Sou. Dropadi Chendage
Sou. Indumati Bhosale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Arguments
Arguments
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 14-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 15-07-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Petition No. 11/2017 (Tasgaon Junior Civil Court, Sangli District) Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court directed the Taluka Inspector of Land Records (T.I.L.R.), Tasgaon to conduct a detailed survey and investigation into the disputed land (Plot Nos. 284 and 285) to determine encroachment and ownership issues between the plaintiff and defendant. The court also appointed a Court Commissioner to oversee the survey and submit a detailed report with findings before deciding the main case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Petition No. 11/2017 (Tasgaon Junior Civil Court, Sangli District) Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court directed the Taluka Inspector of Land Records (T.I.L.R.), Tasgaon to conduct a detailed survey and investigation into the disputed land (Plot Nos. 284 and 285) to determine encroachment and ownership issues between the plaintiff and defendant. The court also appointed a Court Commissioner to oversee the survey and submit a detailed report with findings before deciding the main case on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts