Prashant Sampatrao Gawade vs Dhanaji Rangrao Yadav Advocate - Mahajan Gajanan Annappa — 25/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN090000892021
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
24/2021
Filing Date
12-01-2021
Registration No
25/2021
Registration Date
16-01-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prashant Sampatrao Gawade
Adv. Adsul Sachin Shamrao
Respondent(s)
Dhanaji Rangrao Yadav Advocate - Mahajan Gajanan Annappa
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon
Defence Evidence
Evidence
Hearing
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-11-2025 | List of Witness | |
| 22-08-2025 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Dismissed/Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against the defendant regarding disputed property boundaries and construction issues. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in his favor, and would not suffer irreparable loss. Critically, the plaintiff's 7-year silence after an earlier related suit (RCS No. 103/2011) was dismissed in the defendant's favor in 2014 demonstrated negligence and loss of equitable rights, particularly since the plaintiff was aware of the earlier dispute as the original defendant's legal counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Dismissed/Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against the defendant regarding disputed property boundaries and construction issues. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in his favor, and would not suffer irreparable loss. Critically, the plaintiff's 7-year silence after an earlier related suit (RCS No. 103/2011) was dismissed in the defendant's favor in 2014 demonstrated negligence and loss of equitable rights, particularly since the plaintiff was aware of the earlier dispute as the original defendant's legal counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts