Prashant Sampatrao Gawade vs Dhanaji Rangrao Yadav Advocate - Mahajan Gajanan Annappa — 25/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN090000892021

Filing Number

24/2021

Filing Date

12-Jan-2021

Registration No

25/2021

Registration Date

16-Jan-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37
Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Sampatrao Gawade

    Adv. Adsul Sachin Shamrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhanaji Rangrao Yadav Advocate - Mahajan Gajanan Annappa

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  5. 17-Nov-2025

    List of Witness

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  6. 22-Aug-2025

    List of Witness

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  7. 20-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

  8. 25-Apr-2025

    Issues

  9. 21-Mar-2025

    Issues

  10. 07-Mar-2025

    Issues

  11. 14-Feb-2025

    Issues

  12. 17-Jan-2025

    Issues

  13. 06-Dec-2024

    Issues

  14. 15-Nov-2024

    Issues

  15. 04-Oct-2024

    Issues

  16. 04-Sep-2024

    Issues

  17. 07-Aug-2024

    Issues

  18. 10-Jul-2024

    Issues

  19. 12-Jun-2024

    Issues

  20. 10-Apr-2024

    Issues

  21. 06-Mar-2024

    Issues

  22. 02-Feb-2024

    Issues

  23. 10-Jan-2024

    Issues

  24. 22-Nov-2023

    Issues

  25. 13-Oct-2023

    Issues

  26. 04-Sep-2023

    Issues

  27. 19-Jul-2023

    Issues

  28. 30-Apr-2023

    Issues

  29. 13-Apr-2023

    Issues

  30. 27-Mar-2023

    Issues

  31. 22-Feb-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary Petition Dismissed/Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against the defendant regarding disputed property boundaries and construction issues. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in his favor, and would not suffer irreparable loss. Critically, the plaintiff's 7-year silence after an earlier related suit (RCS No. 103/2011) was dismissed in the defendant's favor in 2014 demonstrated negligence and loss of equitable rights, particularly since the plaintiff was aware of the earlier dispute as the original defendant's legal counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 22-Feb-2023

    Issues

  33. 20-Feb-2023

    Order on Exh

  34. 16-Feb-2023

    Order on Exh

  35. 02-Feb-2023

    Order on Exh

  36. 30-Jan-2023

    Order on Exh

  37. 19-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  38. 05-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  39. 11-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  40. 07-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  41. 15-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  42. 07-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  43. 03-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  44. 24-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  45. 22-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  46. 29-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  47. 13-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

  48. 06-May-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  49. 28-Apr-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  50. 28-Apr-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  51. 13-Apr-2022

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  52. 07-Mar-2022

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  53. 21-Feb-2022

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  54. 16-Feb-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  55. 08-Feb-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  56. 07-Feb-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  57. 17-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  58. 03-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  59. 13-Dec-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  60. 13-Nov-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  61. 18-Oct-2021

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  62. 01-Oct-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  63. 08-Sep-2021

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  64. 23-Aug-2021

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  65. 05-Aug-2021

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  66. 29-Jun-2021

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  67. 16-Apr-2021

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  68. 05-Apr-2021

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  69. 08-Mar-2021

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  70. 24-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  71. 08-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

  72. 16-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  73. 12-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Dismissed/Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against the defendant regarding disputed property boundaries and construction issues. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked balance of convenience in his favor, and would not suffer irreparable loss. Critically, the plaintiff's 7-year silence after an earlier related suit (RCS No. 103/2011) was dismissed in the defendant's favor in 2014 demonstrated negligence and loss of equitable rights, particularly since the plaintiff was aware of the earlier dispute as the original defendant's legal counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case