Poonam Vishal Jagtap vs Vishal Raghunath Jagtap Advocate - Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan — 7/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN090000292025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th April 2026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2025

Filing Number

8/2025

Filing Date

08-01-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

08-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38
Partition Act Section 4,8

Petitioner(s)

Poonam Vishal Jagtap

Adv. Patil Praveen Shashikant

Piyush Vishal Jagtap Through Gurdian Mother Poonam Vishal Jagtap

Respondent(s)

Vishal Raghunath Jagtap Advocate - Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Raghunath Sopan Jagtap

Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Alka Raghunath Jagtap

Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Vikram Raghunath Jagtap

Priyanka Vikram Jagtap

Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Vaishali Subhash Suryawanshi

Kusum Sambhaji Patil

Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Indutai Namdev Patil

Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Mangal Tanaji Patil

Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Tasgaon.

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

28-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

08-12-2025

W.S. and Say

30-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

25-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

23-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

In RCS No. 7/2025 (Poonam etc.1 Vs. Vishal etc.8), the court rejected the adjournment application filed by defendants 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 to file a written statement, as the stipulated time had already expired. The suit shall proceed without the written statements of these defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In RCS No. 7/2025 (Poonam etc.1 Vs. Vishal etc.8), the court rejected the adjournment application filed by defendants 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 to file a written statement, as the stipulated time had already expired. The suit shall proceed without the written statements of these defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case