Padmawati Sangle vs Vasant Parit — 6/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN090000212019

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

7/2019

Filing Date

04-01-2019

Registration No

6/2019

Registration Date

07-01-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Padmawati Sangle

Adv. Adsul Sachin Shamrao

Mahadev Thorat

Sadashiv Thorat

Pramod Lavate

Pradeep Lavate

Meena Harale

Respondent(s)

Vasant Parit

Ramesh Parit(Legal Heir)(Dead)

Rajendra Parit

Sushila Parit

Jayashree Patil

Prakash Parit(Legal Heir)(Dead)

Balkrishna Parit(Legal Heir)(Dead) 7.

Sou. Jayshri Yogesh Rasal

Shankar Parit

Vasant Damate

Kasturi Swami Jangam

Hanmant Swami Jangam

Dhulappa Swami Jangam

Nanda Swami Jangam

Sarpancha Grampanchayat Kavathe Ekand

Gramsevak Grampanchayat Kavathe Ekand

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Tasgaon

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

30-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

29-08-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-06-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

30-11-2019
Order on Exhibit

The court dismissed Defendant No. 9's appeal and allowed the plaintiff's petition for correction of the property description in the case documents. The court permitted Defendant No. 9 to make necessary corrections to their counter-claim and affidavit within 14 days, allowing the suit to proceed on its merits regarding the disputed land boundary and property demarcation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Defendant No. 9's appeal and allowed the plaintiff's petition for correction of the property description in the case documents. The court permitted Defendant No. 9 to make necessary corrections to their counter-claim and affidavit within 14 days, allowing the suit to proceed on its merits regarding the disputed land boundary and property demarcation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Tasgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case