Archana Shivaji Salgar vs Swapnil Balasaheb Kolekar — 223/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080015272025
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
13-10-2025
Filing Number
334/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
223/2025
Registration Date
17-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Archana Shivaji Salgar
Adv. BHARAT GADADE
Respondent(s)
Swapnil Balasaheb Kolekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 04-02-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 16-01-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: In R.C.S.223/2025 (Archana Salgar v/s. Swapnil Kolekar), the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction against the defendant regarding a disputed property was rejected. Instead, the Civil Judge ordered both parties to maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property until the next date, finding that a status-quo order would serve the purpose of urgent justice more appropriately than an ad-interim injunction, given the conflicting claims of property ownership and possession between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In R.C.S.223/2025 (Archana Salgar v/s. Swapnil Kolekar), the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction against the defendant regarding a disputed property was rejected. Instead, the Civil Judge ordered both parties to maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property until the next date, finding that a status-quo order would serve the purpose of urgent justice more appropriately than an ad-interim injunction, given the conflicting claims of property ownership and possession between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts