Archana Shivaji Salgar vs Swapnil Balasaheb Kolekar — 223/2025

Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN080015272025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

e-Filing Number

13-10-2025

Filing Number

334/2025

Filing Date

15-10-2025

Registration No

223/2025

Registration Date

17-10-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Archana Shivaji Salgar

Adv. BHARAT GADADE

Respondent(s)

Swapnil Balasaheb Kolekar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH

04-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

12-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

04-02-2026

Written Statement

16-01-2026

Written Statement

Interim Orders

04-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In R.C.S.223/2025 (Archana Salgar v/s. Swapnil Kolekar), the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction against the defendant regarding a disputed property was rejected. Instead, the Civil Judge ordered both parties to maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property until the next date, finding that a status-quo order would serve the purpose of urgent justice more appropriately than an ad-interim injunction, given the conflicting claims of property ownership and possession between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In R.C.S.223/2025 (Archana Salgar v/s. Swapnil Kolekar), the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction against the defendant regarding a disputed property was rejected. Instead, the Civil Judge ordered both parties to maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property until the next date, finding that a status-quo order would serve the purpose of urgent justice more appropriately than an ad-interim injunction, given the conflicting claims of property ownership and possession between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case