Archana Shivaji Salgar vs Swapnil Balasaheb Kolekar — 223/2025
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080015272025
e-Filing Number
13-10-2025
Filing Number
334/2025
Filing Date
15-Oct-2025
Registration No
223/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Archana Shivaji Salgar
Adv. BHARAT GADADE
Respondent(s)
-
1.Swapnil Balasaheb Kolekar
Case History
-
06-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
07-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
12-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
04-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In R.C.S.223/2025 (Archana Salgar v/s. Swapnil Kolekar), the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction against the defendant regarding a disputed property was rejected. Instead, the Civil Judge ordered both parties to maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property until the next date, finding that a status-quo order would serve the purpose of urgent justice more appropriately than an ad-interim injunction, given the conflicting claims of property ownership and possession between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
16-Jan-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
04-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Steps
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
20-Nov-2025
First Order
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
18-Nov-2025
First Order
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
15-Nov-2025
First Order
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
29-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 223/2025
Summary: In R.C.S.223/2025 (Archana Salgar v/s. Swapnil Kolekar), the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction against the defendant regarding a disputed property was rejected. Instead, the Civil Judge ordered both parties to maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property until the next date, finding that a status-quo order would serve the purpose of urgent justice more appropriately than an ad-interim injunction, given the conflicting claims of property ownership and possession between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts