Arpita Shashikant Honkhade vs Shashikant Bhimu Honkhande — 222/2021
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 9B,37(2)K. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN080014132021
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1106/2021
Filing Date
08-10-2021
Registration No
222/2021
Registration Date
22-10-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arpita Shashikant Honkhade
Respondent(s)
Shashikant Bhimu Honkhande
Dipak Bhimu Honkhande
Maruti Bhimu Honkhande
Malan Bhimu Honnkhande
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for witness summons filed by Arpita under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, has been rejected with costs. The court found the application vague and lacking prima facie merit, as it failed to specify the employment period, job position, or demonstrate genuine efforts to obtain the required documents from Shalivahan Patanshetti Hospital. Costs have been imposed in the cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for witness summons filed by Arpita under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, has been rejected with costs. The court found the application vague and lacking prima facie merit, as it failed to specify the employment period, job position, or demonstrate genuine efforts to obtain the required documents from Shalivahan Patanshetti Hospital. Costs have been imposed in the cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts