Chanamaa Shivenanda Shegave vs Bhigarathi Sadashiv Shegave Advocate - Naik Prakash Annasaheb — 246/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN080013652023

Awaiting Notice

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

327/2023

Filing Date

29-08-2023

Registration No

246/2023

Registration Date

29-08-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath

Judge

2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Chanamaa Shivenanda Shegave

Adv. Mhamane Rajkumar Sidram

Pruthvi Shivanand Shegave

Respondent(s)

Bhigarathi Sadashiv Shegave Advocate - Naik Prakash Annasaheb

Appasaheb Sadashive Shegave

Mangal Annapatil Patil

Mahadevi Mallappa Dugganavar

Murgyavva Shivgonda Jattenavar

Shantabai Kallappa Bilur

Vilas Basappa Hendoli

Chidanand Basappa Hendoli

Shankar Basappa Hendoli

Godabai Shivappa Belkode

Surekha Ravsaheb Darur

Shivappa Basgonda Latti

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH

07-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

10-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

19-12-2025

Awaiting Notice

22-09-2025

Awaiting Notice

18-08-2025

Awaiting Notice

Interim Orders

30-08-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In RCS 246/2023 (Channamma v. Bhagirathi), the court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement. The written statement has been marked as an exhibit and taken on record. The court noted that no "NO WS" order had been passed and the written statement was necessary for consideration of the pending interim injunction application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In RCS 246/2023 (Channamma v. Bhagirathi), the court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement. The written statement has been marked as an exhibit and taken on record. The court noted that no "NO WS" order had been passed and the written statement was necessary for consideration of the pending interim injunction application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case