Prafull Prabhakar Pathak vs Nobody — 33/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 1857 Act 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 07th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN080010322025
e-Filing Number
29-07-2025
Filing Number
228/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
01-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prafull Prabhakar Pathak
Adv. ISHWARAPPA HADIMANI
Prasad Prabhakar Pathak
Adv. ISHWARAPPA HADIMANI
Respondent(s)
Nobody
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 31-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 28-11-2025 | Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Civil Judge Junior Division at Jath granted an heirship certificate to applicants Prafulla Pathak and another, recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of deceased Prabhakar Pandurang Pathak under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827. The court found their claim satisfied under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, with no objections filed after public notice and unchallenged evidence supporting their status as heirs needed for trustee appointment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Civil Judge Junior Division at Jath granted an heirship certificate to applicants Prafulla Pathak and another, recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of deceased Prabhakar Pandurang Pathak under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827. The court found their claim satisfied under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, with no objections filed after public notice and unchallenged evidence supporting their status as heirs needed for trustee appointment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts