Mrs Nirmala Sushant Aratal vs Smt Anusaya Siddhappa Pujari — 94/2024

Summary of RCS 94/2024 Nirmala Sushant Aratal Vs Anusaya Pujari and Ors The court rejected Defendant 2's application challenging the valuation of the partition suit, finding that the plaint was not undervalued. The court held that since the suit is for partition, court fees need not be paid on the face value of the sale deed, and that in partition suits, it is not necessary to challenge alienations of the property. Additionally, the court allowed a subsequent application permitting the defendants to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness and proceed with the suit on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.