Mrs Nirmala Sushant Aratal vs Smt Anusaya Siddhappa Pujari — 94/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34, 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN080009342024

e-Filing Number

24-06-2024

Filing Number

156/2024

Filing Date

24-Jun-2024

Registration No

94/2024

Registration Date

24-Jun-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath

Judge

2-Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34, 38
Partition Act
Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 39 Rule 1A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mrs Nirmala Sushant Aratal

    Adv. Shegunshi Shivshankar N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt Anusaya Siddhappa Pujari

  2. 2.Shri Laxman Hanmant Pujari

  3. 3.Mrs Kasturi Laxman Pujari

  4. 4.Madinabi Chand Shaikh

  5. 5.Rizwanbi Shaheer Shaikh

  6. 6.Chandrakant Irappa Birajdar

  7. 7.Sukhadevi Chandrakant Patil

  8. 8.Annaraya Chandrakant Patil

  9. 9.Basavaraj Chandrakant Patil

  10. 10.Chairman/ Secretary Darikonur Sarva Seva Sahakari Society Ltd Darikonur

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of RCS 94/2024 Nirmala Sushant Aratal Vs Anusaya Pujari and Ors The court rejected Defendant 2's application challenging the valuation of the partition suit, finding that the plaint was not undervalued. The court held that since the suit is for partition, court fees need not be paid on the face value of the sale deed, and that in partition suits, it is not necessary to challenge alienations of the property. Additionally, the court allowed a subsequent application permitting the defendants to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness and proceed with the suit on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  7. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  8. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  9. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  10. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  11. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  12. 11-Feb-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  13. 11-Feb-2025

    IssuesView PDF

  14. 11-Feb-2025

    List of Witness

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  15. 07-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  16. 12-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  17. 24-Sep-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  18. 25-Jun-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  19. 25-Jun-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 25-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 24-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 94/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RCS 94/2024 Nirmala Sushant Aratal Vs Anusaya Pujari and Ors The court rejected Defendant 2's application challenging the valuation of the partition suit, finding that the plaint was not undervalued. The court held that since the suit is for partition, court fees need not be paid on the face value of the sale deed, and that in partition suits, it is not necessary to challenge alienations of the property. Additionally, the court allowed a subsequent application permitting the defendants to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness and proceed with the suit on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case