Gangaram Bhimanna Mali (irale) vs Baburao Aallappa irale Advocate - More Pandurang Dnyanoba — 124/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section partition ,possesion. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 18-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN080008372022

Filing Number

224/2022

Filing Date

24-May-2022

Registration No

124/2022

Registration Date

24-May-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath

Judge

2-Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section partition ,possesion

Petitioner(s)

1.Gangaram Bhimanna Mali (irale)

Adv. Gavade Prashant Sampatrao

Respondent(s)

1.Baburao Aallappa irale Advocate - More Pandurang Dnyanoba

Case History

18-Apr-2026

Next hearingPending
27-Mar-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
07-Mar-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
13-Feb-2026

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
27-Jan-2026

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
02-Jan-2026

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
12-Dec-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
11-Dec-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
21-Nov-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
01-Nov-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
10-Oct-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary: In this partition suit (RCS 124/2022), the court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC granting a final opportunity to proceed with the case, considering the senior citizen status of Defendant 5 and the nature of the suit. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 200/- to the defendants and directed to be meticulous in prosecuting the suit, with the defendants retaining their right to cross-examine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Oct-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
04-Oct-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
26-Aug-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
10-Jun-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
11-Mar-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
04-Jan-2025

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
15-Nov-2024

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
18-Oct-2024

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
18-Sep-2024

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
16-Aug-2024

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
08-Jul-2024

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
26-Mar-2024

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
04-Dec-2023

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
09-Sep-2023

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
11-Aug-2023

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
01-Jul-2023

Evidence

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
28-Apr-2023

Argument on Pre_Issues

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
27-Jan-2023

Argument on Pre_Issues

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
11-Nov-2022

Argument on Pre_Issues

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
16-Sep-2022

Order on T.I.View PDF
16-Sep-2022

Argument on Pre_Issues

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
12-Sep-2022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
08-Sep-2022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
02-Sep-2022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
26-Aug-2022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
20-Aug-2022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
19-Aug-2022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
05-Aug-2022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
08-Jul-2022

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
02-Jul-2022

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
21-Jun-2022

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
31-May-2022

Order on Exh

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
25-May-2022

Order on Exh

Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH
24-May-2022

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-May-2022

Case filed

Registration No. 124/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this partition suit (RCS 124/2022), the court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC granting a final opportunity to proceed with the case, considering the senior citizen status of Defendant 5 and the nature of the suit. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 200/- to the defendants and directed to be meticulous in prosecuting the suit, with the defendants retaining their right to cross-examine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.