Dhannakka Vitthal Kottalagi vs Chetan Pargonda Gumachi Advocate - Desai Vijaykumar Shivaji — 119/2025
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34,38. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080008052025
e-Filing Number
20-06-2025
Filing Number
173/2025
Filing Date
23-Jun-2025
Registration No
119/2025
Registration Date
24-Jun-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dhannakka Vitthal Kottalagi
Adv. BHARAT GADADE
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chetan Pargonda Gumachi Advocate - Desai Vijaykumar Shivaji
-
2.Sidraya Shivninga Hipparagi
-
3.Basakka Pargonda Gumachi
-
4.Sayyavva Sidraya Hipparagi
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
07-Mar-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
11-Feb-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
29-Jan-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
07-Jan-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
09-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
22-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
04-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
In Civil Suit No. 119/2025 (partition and injunction case), the court issued a show cause notice to defendant No. 1 regarding why an injunction should not be granted, without passing any ad-interim order pending hearing of both parties. Examination and substituted service (E.P. and S.B.) was allowed if prayed, with the case returnable on 22/08/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
30-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2025
In Civil Suit No. 119/2025 (partition and injunction case), the court issued a show cause notice to defendant No. 1 regarding why an injunction should not be granted, without passing any ad-interim order pending hearing of both parties. Examination and substituted service (E.P. and S.B.) was allowed if prayed, with the case returnable on 22/08/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts