Tamijabi Mahamad Shaikh vs Jamir Ratilal Shaikh — 106/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section partition,possession,injunction. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN080007132022

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

182/2022

Filing Date

29-04-2022

Registration No

106/2022

Registration Date

02-05-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath

Judge

2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section partition,possession,injunction

Petitioner(s)

Tamijabi Mahamad Shaikh

Adv. Shinde Ramesh Shamrao

Respondent(s)

Jamir Ratilal Shaikh

Chhabubi Moula Mujawar

Ramijabi Ratilal Shaikh

Imamhusen Kadar Shaikh

Dilshabi Imamhusen Shaikh

Soham Hasmukh Patil

Nilam Hasmukh Patil

Hasmukh Shamrao Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH

07-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

28-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-02-2026

Notice_Unready

29-11-2025

Notice_Unready

31-10-2025

Notice_Unready

Interim Orders

31-10-2025
Order on T.I.

Summary In RCS 106/2022 (Tamijabi vs Jamir & Ors), the interim injunction application under CPC Order 39 was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience tilted in her favor, and she would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused in this ancestral property partition suit. Defendant 1 was temporarily restrained from creating any third-party rights, title, or interest in the suit property until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In RCS 106/2022 (Tamijabi vs Jamir & Ors), the interim injunction application under CPC Order 39 was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience tilted in her favor, and she would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused in this ancestral property partition suit. Defendant 1 was temporarily restrained from creating any third-party rights, title, or interest in the suit property until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case