Tamijabi Mahamad Shaikh vs Jamir Ratilal Shaikh — 106/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section partition,possession,injunction. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080007132022
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
182/2022
Filing Date
29-04-2022
Registration No
106/2022
Registration Date
02-05-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tamijabi Mahamad Shaikh
Adv. Shinde Ramesh Shamrao
Respondent(s)
Jamir Ratilal Shaikh
Chhabubi Moula Mujawar
Ramijabi Ratilal Shaikh
Imamhusen Kadar Shaikh
Dilshabi Imamhusen Shaikh
Soham Hasmukh Patil
Nilam Hasmukh Patil
Hasmukh Shamrao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 28-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-02-2026 | Notice_Unready | |
| 29-11-2025 | Notice_Unready | |
| 31-10-2025 | Notice_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary In RCS 106/2022 (Tamijabi vs Jamir & Ors), the interim injunction application under CPC Order 39 was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience tilted in her favor, and she would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused in this ancestral property partition suit. Defendant 1 was temporarily restrained from creating any third-party rights, title, or interest in the suit property until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In RCS 106/2022 (Tamijabi vs Jamir & Ors), the interim injunction application under CPC Order 39 was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience tilted in her favor, and she would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused in this ancestral property partition suit. Defendant 1 was temporarily restrained from creating any third-party rights, title, or interest in the suit property until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts