Tamijabi Mahamad Shaikh vs Jamir Ratilal Shaikh — 106/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section partition,possession,injunction. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN080007132022

Filing Number

182/2022

Filing Date

29-Apr-2022

Registration No

106/2022

Registration Date

02-May-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath

Judge

2-Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section partition,possession,injunction

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tamijabi Mahamad Shaikh

    Adv. Shinde Ramesh Shamrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jamir Ratilal Shaikh

  2. 2.Chhabubi Moula Mujawar

  3. 3.Ramijabi Ratilal Shaikh

  4. 4.Imamhusen Kadar Shaikh

  5. 5.Dilshabi Imamhusen Shaikh

  6. 6.Soham Hasmukh Patil

  7. 7.Nilam Hasmukh Patil

  8. 8.Hasmukh Shamrao Patil

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  3. 28-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  6. 31-Oct-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary In RCS 106/2022 (Tamijabi vs Jamir & Ors), the interim injunction application under CPC Order 39 was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience tilted in her favor, and she would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused in this ancestral property partition suit. Defendant 1 was temporarily restrained from creating any third-party rights, title, or interest in the suit property until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 31-Oct-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  8. 25-Jul-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  9. 02-May-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  10. 17-Mar-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  11. 26-Dec-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  12. 09-Oct-2024

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  13. 19-Jul-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  14. 22-Mar-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  15. 01-Dec-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  16. 21-Sep-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  17. 09-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  18. 28-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  19. 03-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  20. 04-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  21. 26-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  22. 14-Jul-2022

    Notice_Unready

    Jt.CIVIL Judge, Jr.Dn.,JATH

  23. 05-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 29-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In RCS 106/2022 (Tamijabi vs Jamir & Ors), the interim injunction application under CPC Order 39 was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case, balance of convenience tilted in her favor, and she would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was refused in this ancestral property partition suit. Defendant 1 was temporarily restrained from creating any third-party rights, title, or interest in the suit property until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case