Bhouravva Shrishail Magdum vs malkappa basgonda magdum Advocate - Naik Prakash Annasaheb — 88/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section injunction. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 18-Apr-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN080005602018

Filing Number

135/2018

Filing Date

17-May-2018

Registration No

88/2018

Registration Date

19-May-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jath

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section injunction

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhouravva Shrishail Magdum

    Adv. Mathapati Chidanand Shantayya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.malkappa basgonda magdum Advocate - Naik Prakash Annasaheb

Case History

  1. 18-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  5. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  6. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  7. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  8. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  9. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  10. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  11. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  12. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  13. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  14. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  15. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  16. 16-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  17. 05-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  18. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  19. 08-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  20. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  21. 19-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  22. 10-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  23. 11-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  24. 06-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  25. 23-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  26. 06-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  27. 23-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  28. 16-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  29. 12-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  30. 22-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  31. 09-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  32. 22-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  33. 27-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  34. 02-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  35. 06-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  36. 05-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  37. 05-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  38. 28-Aug-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  39. 17-Jun-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  40. 02-Jun-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  41. 20-May-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  42. 30-Apr-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  43. 28-Feb-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  44. 01-Jan-2020

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  45. 22-Nov-2019

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  46. 14-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  47. 11-Oct-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  48. 25-Sep-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  49. 21-Sep-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  50. 11-Sep-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  51. 28-Aug-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  52. 21-Aug-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  53. 14-Aug-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  54. 31-Jul-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  55. 17-Jul-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  56. 28-Jun-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  57. 24-Apr-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  58. 15-Mar-2019

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    SUMMARY The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to restrain defendants from disposing of disputed ancestral properties was rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as documentary evidence (sale deed from 1979 and relinquishment deed from 2011) showed the properties were self-acquired by defendant no.1 and owned by defendant no.6, not ancestral joint family property. The court set aside the interim ex-parte order dated 19.05.2018 and directed costs to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  59. 15-Mar-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  60. 07-Mar-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  61. 27-Feb-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  62. 20-Feb-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  63. 01-Feb-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  64. 08-Jan-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  65. 13-Dec-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  66. 08-Dec-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  67. 16-Nov-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  68. 19-Oct-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  69. 28-Sep-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  70. 24-Aug-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  71. 07-Aug-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  72. 04-Jul-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  73. 11-Jun-2018

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath

  74. 19-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  75. 17-May-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2018

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to restrain defendants from disposing of disputed ancestral properties was rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as documentary evidence (sale deed from 1979 and relinquishment deed from 2011) showed the properties were self-acquired by defendant no.1 and owned by defendant no.6, not ancestral joint family property. The court set aside the interim ex-parte order dated 19.05.2018 and directed costs to follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case