Suman Tukaram Shinde vs Tukaram Sopan Shinde Advocate - Kashid Amar Ishwarrao — 63/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080005222025
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
07-04-2025
Filing Number
94/2025
Filing Date
07-04-2025
Registration No
63/2025
Registration Date
11-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suman Tukaram Shinde
Adv. Mathapati Chidanand Shantayya
Vaishali Dhanaji Shinde
Adv. Mathapati Chidanand Shantayya
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Sopan Shinde Advocate - Kashid Amar Ishwarrao
Dhanaji Sopan Shinde
Rahul Shivaji Patil
Sunita Rangrav Kodag
Vaibhav Lakshman Kodag
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Evidence
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 25-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-12-2025 | Steps | |
| 17-10-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court ordered that Defendant No. 4 shall not perform any unauthorized actions regarding the property and directed both parties to maintain the status quo ("as it was") on the disputed property. The order was issued on 25.02.2026 by the Civil Judge Jr. Division at Jath, concerning a property dispute where the plaintiff sought to prevent the defendant from disturbing the plaintiff's possession based on an allegedly unauthorized deed dated 20.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court ordered that Defendant No. 4 shall not perform any unauthorized actions regarding the property and directed both parties to maintain the status quo ("as it was") on the disputed property. The order was issued on 25.02.2026 by the Civil Judge Jr. Division at Jath, concerning a property dispute where the plaintiff sought to prevent the defendant from disturbing the plaintiff's possession based on an allegedly unauthorized deed dated 20.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts