Shamrao shivappa khandekar vs shankar mayappa khandekar Advocate - Dudhal Ajit Baburao — 65/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section partition,possession,injunction. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080004852021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
109/2021
Filing Date
19-03-2021
Registration No
65/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shamrao shivappa khandekar
Adv. Nitave Ashok Appanna
Namdeo Shivappa Khandekar
Adv. Nitave Ashok Appanna
Respondent(s)
shankar mayappa khandekar Advocate - Dudhal Ajit Baburao
Vishwas Shankar Khandekar
Maruti Mayappa Khandekar
Bhiva Mayappa Khandekar
Bhimrao Mayappa Khandekar
Phulabai Ramkrushna Bandgar
Subabai Pandurang Edake
Kamalabai Datta Tengale
Sanjay Sambhaji Bandgar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 21-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 03-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Temporary injunction granted in favor of plaintiffs. The court restrained Defendant No. 9 from alienating ancestral joint family properties or obstructing the plaintiffs' joint possession with other co-sharers pending final disposition of the partition suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the properties are undivided joint family assets and that possession cannot be transferred to a purchaser without formal partition by metes and bounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Temporary injunction granted in favor of plaintiffs. The court restrained Defendant No. 9 from alienating ancestral joint family properties or obstructing the plaintiffs' joint possession with other co-sharers pending final disposition of the partition suit. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the properties are undivided joint family assets and that possession cannot be transferred to a purchaser without formal partition by metes and bounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts