The State of Mharashtra vs Sachin Yashwant Kolekar — 70/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,511,461,427,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN080003632023
Filing Number
246/2023
Filing Date
10-Mar-2023
Registration No
70/2023
Registration Date
13-Mar-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
444
Police Station
JATH POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Mharashtra
Adv. Patil Jitendra Jayavant
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sachin Yashwant Kolekar
-
2.Suhas Miraso Shiveshran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted both accused Sachin Yashwant Kolekar and Suhas Miraso Shivsharan of charges under IPC sections 457, 380, 511, 461, and 427 for allegedly attempting to steal an ATM. The court found the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, particularly due to absence of CCTV footage, no eyewitnesses, missing drag marks on the ground, and inability to prove the accused's presence at the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgment
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgment
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
28-Feb-2026
Judgment
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
20-Jan-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
02-Jan-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
26-Dec-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
05-Dec-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
11-Nov-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
07-Oct-2025
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
04-Oct-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
26-Sep-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
17-Sep-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
30-Aug-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
14-Aug-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
02-Aug-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
30-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
09-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
06-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
17-Feb-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
04-Dec-2023
Summons_Ready
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Jath
-
14-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 70/2023
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class acquitted both accused Sachin Yashwant Kolekar and Suhas Miraso Shivsharan of charges under IPC sections 457, 380, 511, 461, and 427 for allegedly attempting to steal an ATM. The court found the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, particularly due to absence of CCTV footage, no eyewitnesses, missing drag marks on the ground, and inability to prove the accused's presence at the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts