Narsinha Vitthal Shelke vs Pradip Kannusingh Chavan — 8/2026
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 20,38. Status: Notice_Unready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080000422026
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
05-01-2026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Narsinha Vitthal Shelke
Adv. SAGAR VANMANE
Tarasingh Vitthal Shelke
Adv. SAGAR VANMANE
Respondent(s)
Pradip Kannusingh Chavan
Kuldip Kannusingh Chavan
Anil Bhagatsingh Parmar
Jayshree Mahendra Shelke
Asha Raju Parmal
Suraj Raju Parmal
Jayshree Pawan Parmal
Indrajeet Pawan Parmal
Anjana Badal Parmal
Nikhil Badal Parmal
Prem Umaji Salunkhe
Shankar Umaji Salunkhe
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE, Jr.Dn.,JATH
Notice_Unready
First Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Notice_Unready | |
| 12-01-2026 | First Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: In RCS 8/2026 (Narsinh vs Pradip), the court ordered suit summons to be issued to the defendants. The defendants are required to file a written statement within 30 days of receiving the summons to answer the claim, produce relevant documents, and settle the issues in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In RCS 8/2026 (Narsinh vs Pradip), the court ordered suit summons to be issued to the defendants. The defendants are required to file a written statement within 30 days of receiving the summons to answer the claim, produce relevant documents, and settle the issues in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts