Soham Ramesh Chougule Thru. Mother Dipa Ramesh Chougule vs Ramesh Pandurang Chougule Advocate - सौदागर साजिद बाबालाल — 3/2025
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 22. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN080000022025
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2025
Filing Number
1/2025
Filing Date
02-01-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
03-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jath
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Soham Ramesh Chougule Thru. Mother Dipa Ramesh Chougule
Adv. मठपती चिदानंद शांताय्या
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Pandurang Chougule Advocate - सौदागर साजिद बाबालाल
Suresh Pandurang Chougule
Adv. सौदागर साजिद बाबालाल
Shahajahan Ilai Shaikh
Adv. मल्लाड धर्मेंद्र तिर्थेद्र
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. JATH
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 06-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 01-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 30-08-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 08-08-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In case R.D.M. No. 03/2025 (Soham Chougule v. Ramesh Chougule), the court ordered that proceedings against defendants 1-3 be conducted ex-parte (in their absence) without filing a written statement, as they repeatedly failed to appear despite being called despite being called, despite being called, even though they were represented. The order was passed on 20/06/2025 by the District Court, Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In case R.D.M. No. 03/2025 (Soham Chougule v. Ramesh Chougule), the court ordered that proceedings against defendants 1-3 be conducted ex-parte (in their absence) without filing a written statement, as they repeatedly failed to appear despite being called despite being called, despite being called, even though they were represented. The order was passed on 20/06/2025 by the District Court, Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts