SATISH SHIVAJI KOLI vs NO BODY — 84/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN070014752025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
1233/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
84/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,kmahankal
Judge
4-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATISH SHIVAJI KOLI
Adv. Patole Satish Hambirrao
Respondent(s)
NO BODY
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 18-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted the petitioner Satish Shivaji Koli's application for interim custody of a seized Maruti Alto vehicle (MH 10 EJ 1198) under CrPC 503, subject to an indemnity bond of ₹5 lakh and specified conditions. Although the prosecution opposed the plea citing risks of misuse, the court found that the vehicle's prolonged detention at the police station could cause deterioration, and since no chargesheet was filed yet, interim custody was justified with conditions that the vehicle must not be transferred, must be produced when ordered, and photographs/panchnama must be maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the petitioner Satish Shivaji Koli's application for interim custody of a seized Maruti Alto vehicle (MH 10 EJ 1198) under CrPC 503, subject to an indemnity bond of ₹5 lakh and specified conditions. Although the prosecution opposed the plea citing risks of misuse, the court found that the vehicle's prolonged detention at the police station could cause deterioration, and since no chargesheet was filed yet, interim custody was justified with conditions that the vehicle must not be transferred, must be produced when ordered, and photographs/panchnama must be maintained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts