Suhas Shamrao Patil vs MS Sarjan Reality Private Limited Advocate - Kshirsagar Amol Rajaram — 95/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 10,32,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN070008732025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-07-2025
Filing Number
178/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
95/2025
Registration Date
01-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,kmahankal
Judge
3-Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. KAVATHEMAHANKAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suhas Shamrao Patil
Adv. Jadhav Balaso Sadashiv
Respondent(s)
MS Sarjan Reality Private Limited Advocate - Kshirsagar Amol Rajaram
Amol Giridhar Patil
Adv. Bangar Shrinivas Subhash
Secretary Nagaj Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Society Ltd Nagaj
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. KAVATHEMAHANKAL
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 21-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 19-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary RCS No. 95/2025 - Suhas Patil vs MS Sarjan Reality Pvt. Ltd. The court rejected the defendant's application seeking rejection of the plaint under CPC Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d). The court found that the suit raises triable issues regarding the validity and scope of the power of attorney, alleged breach thereof, and possible violation of agricultural land transfer laws, which cannot be summarily rejected at the pleading stage. The case will proceed to trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary RCS No. 95/2025 - Suhas Patil vs MS Sarjan Reality Pvt. Ltd. The court rejected the defendant's application seeking rejection of the plaint under CPC Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d). The court found that the suit raises triable issues regarding the validity and scope of the power of attorney, alleged breach thereof, and possible violation of agricultural land transfer laws, which cannot be summarily rejected at the pleading stage. The case will proceed to trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts