Swaraj Multistate Nidhi Ltd Dhalgaon Through Umesh Vitthal Dagade vs Kakaso Dadaso Mane Advocate - Atpadkar Vijayaratna Nivant — 130/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN070002712024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2024
Filing Number
215/2024
Filing Date
15-03-2024
Registration No
130/2024
Registration Date
16-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,kmahankal
Judge
4-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Swaraj Multistate Nidhi Ltd Dhalgaon Through Umesh Vitthal Dagade
Adv. Shete Manisha Rahul
Respondent(s)
Kakaso Dadaso Mane Advocate - Atpadkar Vijayaratna Nivant
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal
Evidence Part Heard
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 20-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 26-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 10-09-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition seeking to amend the FIR by replacing the name of authorized representative Mr. Umesh Vitthol Dagde with Mr. Govind Ram Tingre (due to the former's illness) under a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case has been allowed. The court directed the complainant organization to file a complete amended application with full particulars including name, age, occupation, and address of the new authorized representative before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition seeking to amend the FIR by replacing the name of authorized representative Mr. Umesh Vitthol Dagde with Mr. Govind Ram Tingre (due to the former's illness) under a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case has been allowed. The court directed the complainant organization to file a complete amended application with full particulars including name, age, occupation, and address of the new authorized representative before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts