Duryodhan Akaram Fonde vs Akaram Joga Fonde — 58/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37,38. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Steps_Unready Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN070002402022

e-Filing Number

01-04-2022

Filing Number

85/2022

Filing Date

04-Apr-2022

Registration No

58/2022

Registration Date

04-Apr-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,kmahankal

Judge

3-Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 37,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Duryodhan Akaram Fonde

    Adv. Nimbalkar Shekharraje S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akaram Joga Fonde

  2. 2.Bandu Akaram Fonde

  3. 3.Bhagavan Ramchandra Chormule

  4. 4.Bira Joga Phonde

  5. 5.Rajaram Tukaram Phonde

  6. 6.Hari Tukaram Phonde

  7. 7.Nanda Bhagavan Khandekar

  8. 8.Shobha Raju Rupanar

  9. 9.Kondiba Nana Phonde

  10. 10.Kumar Rajaram Phonde

  11. 11.Ananda Rajaram Phonde

  12. 12.Malan Rajaram Phonde

  13. 13.Ankush Kisan Kolekar

  14. 14.Dattatray Tanaji Kolekar

  15. 15.Balkrushna Tukaram Phonde

  16. 16.Shankar Anna Phonde

  17. 17.Rajabai Tukaram Phonde

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  5. 22-Aug-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  6. 27-Jun-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  7. 09-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  8. 06-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  9. 13-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  10. 15-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  11. 18-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  12. 20-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  13. 31-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  14. 09-May-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  15. 13-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  16. 23-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  17. 08-Dec-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY Temporary Injunction Application Allowed (RCS No. 58/2022) The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants 1-3 from creating any third-party interest in ancestral agricultural properties located in Sangli district. The plaintiff (son) established a prima facie case that he holds rights in the joint family properties and that defendants were attempting to alienate the suit properties through sale deeds dated 28/04/2009 and 27/09/2011. The court found the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff and that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused, pending final determination of the partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 08-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  19. 10-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  20. 30-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  21. 09-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  22. 03-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  23. 26-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  24. 13-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  25. 02-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  26. 11-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  27. 27-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  28. 13-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  29. 07-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  30. 13-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  31. 27-Mar-2023

    A. D. R.

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  32. 24-Feb-2023

    A. D. R.

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  33. 14-Feb-2023

    A. D. R.

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  34. 01-Feb-2023

    A. D. R.

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  35. 22-Dec-2022

    A. D. R.

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  36. 15-Nov-2022

    A. D. R.

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  37. 12-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  38. 12-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  39. 20-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  40. 01-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.C.J.J.D J.M.F.C. Kavathemahankal

  41. 18-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal

  42. 15-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal

  43. 06-May-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Kavathe-Mahankal

  44. 07-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 04-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2022

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY Temporary Injunction Application Allowed (RCS No. 58/2022) The court granted a temporary injunction restraining defendants 1-3 from creating any third-party interest in ancestral agricultural properties located in Sangli district. The plaintiff (son) established a prima facie case that he holds rights in the joint family properties and that defendants were attempting to alienate the suit properties through sale deeds dated 28/04/2009 and 27/09/2011. The court found the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff and that irreparable loss would result if the injunction were refused, pending final determination of the partition suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case